Leading child injury prevention researchers at the British Columbia Injury Research and Prevention Unit have today called on ASTM to put on hold its proposal to tighten playground surfacing standards.
The call is in an article written by Associate Profs Mariana Brussoni and Ian Pike of the Unit, along with Associate Prof Alison Macpherson of the School of Kinesiology & Health Science at York University. Between them, the authors have decades of research experience in child injury prevention.
In the piece, posted on the Unit’s website, the authors state that they have “become increasingly concerned that some of our efforts to keep children safe may be doing unintended harm – particularly as it relates to children’s play.” They also argue that “changing the standards will not reflect the best decision for children.”
The authors conclude by urging ASTM to “put the proposal on hold, and to engage in a wider debate about how standards can help us get the balance right.”
In making their case, the authors make five key points, informed by their position as independent and impartial experts in injury prevention:
- Head injuries on the playground are extremely rare and there is no evidence that they are increasing on playgrounds.
- The head injury criterion (HIC) is measured by dropping a head form straight down, but children do not fall that way.
- Ripping out and replacing surfacing is a very expensive proposition.
- Kids want and need to take risks and experience uncertainty. So reducing risks has major ramifications.
- We are doing a miserable job of providing stimulating play opportunities for children.
The article, which has numerous links to peer reviewed academic papers, echoes the case made recently in a paper by Prof David Ball, Professor of Risk Management at Middlesex University’s Centre for Decision Analysis and Risk Management, and by me here in January, with an update in March. It is also a model of brevity and clarity.
We know from ASTM that there will a month-long ballot of members of the committee, which will begin in the next day or two. The authors have asked ASTM to distribute their paper along with the ballot notice. Let’s hope it does.
Let’s hope too that committee members consider carefully the paper’s arguments. Surely when even injury prevention experts who have devoted decades to reducing child accidents imply that playground safety has gone too far, it is time to stop.
Pingback: Children and schools roundup - Freedom's Floodgates
Pingback: The R word: risk, uncertainty and the possibility of adverse outcomes in play | Rethinking Childhood
Pingback: La parola R*****O: rischio, incertezza e la possibilità di esiti spiacevoli |
Pingback: La parola R*****O: rischio, incertezza e la possibilità di esiti spiacevoli – Fuori dalla scuola